The Conclusions and Recommendations could be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

The Conclusions and Recommendations could be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

Conclusions and recommendations

If there aren’t any recommendations to be produced because of the project, just call this section Conclusions.

The Conclusions section sums up the main element points of your discussion, the fundamental popular features of your design, or even the significant outcomes of the investigation. As its function is always to round the story off of your project, it must:

  • be written to relate right to the aims of the project as mentioned in the Introduction
  • indicate the extent to that your aims have been achieved
  • summarise the findings that are key outcomes or information in your report
  • acknowledge limitations and also make suggestions for future work (where applicable)
  • Highlight the usefulness or significance of one’s work.

The conclusions should relate solely to the aims for the work:

The goal of this project is always to design a mobile phone tower for a suburban location..

The cell phone tower presented here could be erected safely in a street that is suburban.

It takes a complete section of a maximum of 2m 2 l, and has the following safety features.

This investigation will review the volume of passengers with the Monash University Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus so that you can recommend adjustments to your service if required.

Analysis for the survey data obtained in this project suggests that use of the Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus has increased by 24% in the past 5 years. It is suggested essay help that frequency be increased during peak usage.

The Conclusions section below is from a known level 2 Civil Engineering Alternative Designs report presenting two designs for a an overpass bridge. Click the buttons that are coloured start to see the comments.

Conclusions

All the two bridge designs Lecturer’s comment:
An elegant beginning for a Conclusions follows on neatly from the discussion that is preceding. In this case, it indicates that the aims for the project have already been met. presented in this report fulfil the criteria specified within the project brief. Both designs Lecturer’s comment:
The main findings or outcomes – in this full case the important thing features of the designs – are then recapped. incorporate round piers on piled foundations, which are used considering that the soil conditions are unknown and perchance unstable. Design 1, an easy i-girder that is composite, has the advantageous asset of being made from steel and so has longer spans and fewer piers.

Design 2, a super-T beam br >Design 2 Lecturer’s comment:
The importance of the results – in this instance the ultimate recommendation – is clearly stated. is therefore recommended. It includes Lecturer’s comment:
To finish off, the achievement of the project is reinforced. An overpass that is affordable superior durability, and fully meets the requirements for the design brief.

Always address limitations and suggest how they may be overcome in future work. The below that is excerpt from the Conclusions of a report on a project investigating the consequence of pulsation on heat transfer in horizontal pipe flow.

Experimental results Lecturer’s comment:
Key conclusions drawn from the project. revealed that pulsed flow without flow reversal had no effect that is significant with steady flow. Preliminary experiments with reversed flow, however, clearly indicated increased heat transfer. This can be likely due Lecturer’s comment:
Provide a possible explanation for notable results, especially unexpected ones. towards the large disturbances into the hydrodynamic boundary layer once the flow changes direction. Further research Lecturer’s comment:
Recommend further research to address any work that is extra think could be useful. is advised to determine the most enhancement that is achievable.

It ought to be noted that Lecturer’s comment:
Acknowledge limitations or errors and suggest explanations and/or solutions. the experimental results do not buy into the equations that are theoretical. This may be as a result of deposits which developed inside the pipe, or to thermocouple temperature that is inconsistent. Therefore, regular inspection for the test rig is recommended.

For a very report that is long it really is acceptable to provide the conclusions and recommendations in point form:

The prototype robot courier presented here has been confirmed to manage to delivering documents autonomously in an working office environment. It has demonstrated the following aspects of mobile robotics:

  1. Localisation: The Kalman localisation that is filter-based achieved sub-centimeter accuracy under normal operating conditions.
  2. Environment modelling: The occupancy map was updated dynamically to add obstacles not within the map that is original.
  3. Path planning: A distance transform-based path planner using obstacle transforms produced a globally optimal local entrapment-free way to the target.